Location: Home :: Commentary :: My Web Journal (or Blog)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What follows is the journal of Don Thornton II. This page contains the entries
for the selected month (or the month of the most recent entry if none was
selected). Being a journal its main purpose is to express opinions on whatever
subjects happen to be interesting on any given day. Any links embedded within
entries are subject to linkrot
and may or may not be corrected at some
unannounced date. Choose a month to see entries for that month, or choose a
date to jump straight to that date's entry within this page.
--ArielMT
I'm still alive, just way too busy to update anything.
It's here. Microsoft Windows Vista
goes on sale Tuesday.
It's a rushed
product that has now had two months of public scrutiny in its final
form. If you're even thinking of upgrading from Windows XP to Windows
Vista,
please save your sanity and don't do it.
Just don't even
think about buying a Vista upgrade. Microsoft's new operating system
demands more hardware upgrades than Windows 95 did. Besides, the price
factor alone should give you pause for thought: Any given edition of
Windows Vista costs about half again as much as a comparable edition of
Windows XP.
If you really, truly, desperately want Windows Vista on your computer, then buy a new computer with it preinstalled. I'm serious. Even though you'll have to buy a more expensive computer, it'll be less expensive than trying to upgrade your existing computer to something Windows Vista will be happy with, and you'll be far less frustrated and disappointed than trying to install an upgrade. It might even save you from the devastation of being stuck with a half-installed OS, unable to finish and unable to go back, should the upgrade fail for any reason.
To their credit, like XP, Vista has a files and settings migration wizard which will let you transfer your files and program settings from your old computer to a new one, but like XP there's a catch. It will not transfer your programs themselves. You must install your non-Microsoft applications on the new computer before running the wizard, in order for the wizard to recognize what settings need to be transfered. You do still have your installation disks, updates, patches, and license keys, right?
Oh, did I mention that Windows Vista is a rushed product, in spite of
being four years late? It isn't even on store shelves yet, and
Microsoft have already announced that
Windows Vista Service Pack 1 will be pushed before the year is
out.
Even
Firefox has issues
with Vista. Here are
ten
more reasons
if you need them.
Still on the Windows-bashing front, I have come across what may
actually be
the longest suicide note in history.
The note itself is
called
"Output Content Protection and Windows Vista,"
was written
by Microsoft, and weighs in at 44 pages long. It details the
DRM
system's
output "protection" subsystem present in Windows Vista and what's
required of hardware manufacturers to comply.
The Free Software
Foundation
has a two-part
analysis of Microsoft's "suicide note"
by former corporate
hacker Oliver Day, looking at both the unusually vague technical
specifications and at Peter Gutmann's analysis (to which I linked
above).
Full compliance requires the suspension of the known laws of physics, and even partial compliance will require hardware manufacturers to make and sell very expensive products. Worse still, Microsoft reserve the right to turn any such expensive device into a paperweight by revoking the driver's certificate, and they've shown the intent to do so under even the slightest bit of pressure from the RIAA or MPAA. (Microsoft have fallen behind with patches to several bugs with exploits already in the wild, yet they recently rushed out a DRM patch to Windows Media Player almost before the proof of concept hit security researchers' desks.)
If any hardware manufacturers decide to adhere strictly enough to join Microsoft's Windows suicide party, then the best that can happen in the event of a driver certificate revocation is that Windows itself will intentionally degrade whatever it considers "premium content" or "protected content" to a point as bad as broadcast (analog) radio/TV program content. The worst that'll happen is that Windows will completely disable the device whenever such content is loaded. Both cases result in symptoms completely indistinguishable from plain and simple hardware failure and the unfair tarnishing of the hardware manufacturer's name.
So what are the alternatives?
If upgrading to Windows Vista is too expensive yet leaving Microsoft
behind is even more so, then stay with Windows XP. The only useful
features in Windows Vista are available for Windows XP:
Microsoft Internet
Explorer 7
(which still isn't as good as
Mozilla Firefox
is),
Microsoft Windows Defender
, and a host of third-party
applications, many of which can be downloaded and used for free.
The most hassle-free way to upgrade from Windows to a better
operating system is to buy an Apple Macintosh
computer. Most of the "innovative" features
of Windows Vista were copied, poorly in some cases, from Apple
Mac OS X
.
OS X 10.5 "Leopard" is due out the Spring of this year, and unlike
Windows, which tends to get slower and more resource intensive with
each new version, OS X gets faster and filled with actual useful
features. In an interesting turn of events, Microsoft is committing
with the release of Windows Vista the act of cruelty for which Apple
has been routinely slammed: abandoning support for not-that-old
computer systems, yet with Leopard Apple aren't leaving any recent Macs
behind.
However, if you need or want to keep your PC hardware investment and
just leave Microsoft's software behind, then download, burn, and
install a distribution of GNU/Linux
. The most popular home distro is
Ubuntu
and related
projects. The number one problem facing Linux is, ironically, its most
liberating feature: choice. The operating system is able to perform a
bewildering variety of tasks and roles, and each one of those roles
typically requires choosing the right tool for the job (as does any
task in life). Linux makes the easy things easy and the hard things
at least possible, but only if the right distribution and programs are
chosen. To that end, someone has made a very easy to use
Linux distribution
chooser
to make that task simple. Take the test and answer
a few simple questions, look up the distros it recommends, find which
one fits the bill, and either buy or download it. Regardless of
distribution, for the most part, this is an operating system especially
designed for computers new and old.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All site content: 2001-2007 (C) Don Thornton 2, unless stated otherwise. All rights reserved.
Last update: Thursday, August 23, 2007,